GLOBAL POPULATION GROWTH IN ONE HUNDRED YEARS

Illustrated by countries, 1950,  2000 and estimated for 2050


Why Poverty is unlikely to be history and why solutions are unlikely to be free trade in commodities, migration, or migrant workers in industrialised countries sending back income to their homelands, and why stabilisation of populations may come too late, as  populations are already exhausting resources. The actual population figures explain why growth rates that look harmless, like 2.6% for Mali, are actually grenades.

 1.The WEST

Popn 1950

2000

2050 estimate 

USA

152,271,000l

282,339,000

420,081,000

Russia

101,937,000

146,732,000

110,764,000

Germany

68,375,000

82,188,000

73,607,000

UK

50,127,000

59,522,000

63,977,000

Italy

47,105,000

57,719,000

50,390,000

France

41,829,000

59,382,000

61,017,000

Spain

28,063,000

40,016,000

35,564,000

Poland

24,824,000

38,654,000

32,085,000

Turkey

21,122,000

65,667,000

86,474,000

Romania

16,311,000

22,452,000

18,678,000

Netherlands

10,114,000

15,908,000

17,334,000

Portugal

8,443,000

10,336,000

9,933,000

Australia

8,267,000

19,165,000

24,176,000

Belgium

8,639,000

10,264,000

9,883,000

Greece

7,566,000

10,559,000

10,036,000

Bulgaria

7,250,000

7,818,000

4,651,000

Serbia Montegro

7,106,000

10,850,000

9,782,000

Sweden

7,014,000

8,924,000

9,085,000

Austria

6,935,000

8,113,000

7,521,000

Bosnia&Herzegovina

2,662,000

4,035,000

3,892,000



2. AFRICA

Popn 1950

2000

2050 estimate

Nigeria

31,797,000

114,307,000

356,524,000

Egypt

21,198,000

70,492,000

126,921,000

Ethiopia

20,175,000

64,690,000

144,716,000

South Africa

13,596,000

44,066,000

33,003,000

Congo Kinshasa

13,569,000

52,022,000

183,177,000

Morocco

9,343,000

30,122,000

50,872,000

Algeria

8,893,000

30,309,000

43,984,000

Sudan

8,051,000

35,080,000

84,192,000

Kenya

6,121,000

29,986,000

64,820,000

Uganda

5,522,000

23,249,000

132,699,000

Angola

4,118,000

10,443,000

25,561,000

Mali

3,688,000

10,072,000

40,139,000

Ivory Coast

2,860,000

29,986,000

64,820,000

Zimbabwe 

2,853,000

11,751,000

12,221,000

Zambia 

2,553,000

10,117,000

22,188,000

Rwanda

2,539,000

7,507,000

19,935,000

Somalia

2,438,000

7,252,000

25,500,000

Burundi

2,363,000

6,621,000

22,853,000

Eritrea

1,403,000

4,350,000

10,164,000

Mauritius

 481,000

1,179,000

1,451,000

Botswana

430,000

1,607,000

1,412,000


3. MIDDLE EAST

Popn 1950

2000

2050 estimate

Iran

16,357,000

65,660,000

89,691,000

Afghanistan

8,150,000

23,898,000

81,933,000

Iraq

5,163,000

22,676,000

56.361,000

Saudi Arabia

3,860,000

23,153,000

49,707,000

Israel

1,286,000

5,842,000

8,517,000

West Bank

771,000

2,020,000

5,580,000

Jordan

561,000

4,999,000

11,773,000

Gaza Strip

245,000

1,132,000

4,209,000

 

4. ASIA

 

1950

 

2000

 

estimate 2050

China

562,580,000

1,268,853,000

1,424,162,000

India

369,880,000

1,002,708,000

1,601,005,000

Japan

83,805,000

126,700,000

99,887,000

Indonesia

82,978,000

224,138,000

336,247,000

Bangladesh

45,646,000

130,407,000

279,955,000

Pakistan

39,448,000

146,343,000

294,995,000

Vietnam

23,348,000

79,060,000

107,773,000

Philippines

21,131,000

79,740,000

157,631,000

South Korea

20,846,000

47,351,000

45,224,000

Thailand

20,042,000

61,863,000

69,269,000

North Korea

9,471,000

21,648,000

26,364,000

Nepal

8,990,000

24,702,000

53,294,000

Taiwan

7,981,000

22,151,000

23,204,000

Sri Lanka

7,533,000

19,239,000

23,086,000

Cambodia

4,471,000

12,466,000

25,090,000

 

5. LATIN AMERICA       1950

 

2000

 

estimate 2050

Brazil

53,443,000

175,553,000

228,427,000

Mexico

28,385,000

99,927,000

147,908,000

Argentina

17,150,000

37,498,000

48,740,000

Columbia

11,592,000

39,686,000

64,534,000

Cuba

5,785,000

11,134,000

10,478,000

Haiti

3,097,000

7,306,000

18,403,000

Bolivia

2,766,000

8,153,000

13,773,000

El Salvador

1,940,000

6,123,000

12,039,000

Nicaragua

1,098,000

4,932,000

9,438,000

 

 

 

 

5.OCEANIA

1950              2000

estimate 2050

New Zealand

1,908,000

3,820,000

4,842,000

Papua Niugini

1,412,000

4,927,000

10,670,000

East Timor

436,000

847,000

1,943,000

Fiji

287,348

832,494

1,447,573

Solomon Islands

106,647

466,194

1,110,514

Samoa (not US)

81,858

179,466

170,739

Guam

59,900

155,324

242,692

Vanuatu

52,000

189,618

310,486

Tonga

45,700

102,321

188,340

Nauru

3,431

11,845

22,696

These tables are compiled from the U.S. Census Bureau, International Data Base. 4-26-2005

http://geography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=geography&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fipc%2Fwww%2Fidbsum.html

.

For each country, further demographic data from the Data Base include Births and deaths per 1,000 population, rate of natural increase (percent), annual rate of growth (percent),  life expectancy at birth (years), infant deaths per 1,000 live births, total fertility rate per woman,  midyear population estimates and average annual period growth rates, and  for each decade 1950 to 2050, population by age and sex.

Population pyramids. The bulges in these pyramid structures  for the youngest generations explain the explosive growth and why the population estimates for 2050 are often so high.  For example, 40% of the population of Bolivia is reported to be under 15.  However, the lack of adequate censuses means that many of the figures contain guesswork or are estimated from samples.

Notes
  1. The x axes vary in size according to the population range in each graph, and so large increases can still appear minimal (eg the increases in Bangladesh and Pakistan are huge).
  2. How little wars, famines, massacres and AIDS affect the growth in Africa and the Middle East – they are mere blips.More important are the birth rate, family size, the rate of infant deaths, and the distance between generations – teenage pregnancies shorten the generations so that population growth is higher.
  3. Note the countries where the growth rates have stabilised or even inverted, as in Russia. E&OE. In most of these countries, projected decrease is not below 1950 population sizes.
  4. These data depend upon the reliability of the data published by the US Census Bureau International Data Base. There must be instances where the estimates are more approximate than others.

The figures tie in closely with the data compiled by William Stanton (qv) except that he is pessimistic that the estimates for 2050 may be brought down by predictable Malthusian catastrophes.


Population Densities

Population densities are affected by deserts, mountains, barren soils and adverse climates.  Australia and the Sahara for example, are mostly desert and semi-desert.Egypt is mostly uninhabitable, but huge populations crowd around the Nile River.High population densities are adding to environmental problems and reducing quality of life: in growing megacities, and are increasing socio-economic problems in countries such as the Gaza Strip (3204 persons per square km) Bangladesh (865), Nauru (525), and even the Netherlands (468), and England (382) where the traditional lush countryside and woodlands of Southern England are giving way to housing.Figures from Stanton, 2003. The Rapid Growth of Human Populations 1750-2000:Histories, Consequences, Issues, Nation by Nation. NI: Multiscience Publishing Company Ltd.

Val Yule
Send Email

Comment: On the world scene, the degree of population decline predicted in the West from its 1950 figures seems hardly to be worried about, compared with the degree of population increase in the rest of the world, and indeed, in some countries such as UK and the Netherlands with year 2000 population densities of 382 and 467 per km2.


AN EXAMPLE:

The GAZA STRIP had a population density of around 3204 in 2000 (Stanton).

Further figures that need to be considered to understanding its problems (from IDB as at April 2005)

Births per 1,000 population......................     40
Deaths per 1,000 population....................     4        

Rate of natural increase (percent).............    3.6
Annual rate of growth (percent)................    3.8        

Life expectancy at birth (years).................    71.8
Infant deaths per 1,000 live births.............    23        

Total fertility rate (per woman)..................   5.9       

Average Annual Period Growth Rates: 1950 to 2050 (Population in thousands, rate in percent)

       1950-1960      2.3

       1960-1970      1.1

       1970-1980      2.9

       1980-1990      3.4

       1990-2000      5.7

Some questions about the graphs

1. Are they valid?

The figures have been compiled from the US Census Bureau’s online International Date Base as at April 2005.  Where census data are unavailable, some estimates may be more guesswork than others, but the general directions are clear. If the data are related to population estimates of 1800 and earlier (eg see Stanton), the growth is shown to be even more dramatic. The total world population 250 years ago is estimated at 600 million.

The projections for 2500 are based on age-structure pyramids, not included here. In countries where 40% of the population are under 15, for example, high growth rates can be expected, unless there are some humane or inhumane factors that bring surviving family size down sharply. Immigration is also a factor in the West.

2. The relation of percentage growth rates to actual population change. The bigger the population, the larger the real size of a percentage increase.A smaller percentage increase can have a larger effect than when the population was smaller.

3. Most people do not know the different sizes of the countries of the world. Why not?

4. How population size is related to available and future resources.

Population densities seem relatively small in some countries, but rainfall, deserts, mountains and other barren areas can mean that much apparently empty space is uninhabitable bar a scientific miracle. Some breadbaskets and other sources of food are losing their fertility – eg Montana in USA. Climate change may not improve the situation.

5. The theory of demographic transition, that as people become more prosperous, they will have fewer children.However, the graphs show that the greatest population increases are in countries that are becoming poorer, in large part often because resources cannot cope with the increase.

6. The theory that an ageing population must be disastrous. Children in fact make more demands on the working population than the ageing. Unemployment is a problem with modern technology.The ageing today are healthier and able to contribute greatly to society, including in childcare. The average time of helplessness before death is two years, regardless of age. At some stage keeping a population younger – ie growing- must stop, or there is population catastrophe. Who are the interests that push this theory, and why?

7. What are the interests that benefit from continued population growth? They are a mixed lot.

8. Why is it difficult to get publicity for figures of population growth and family size – for example, during the Make Poverty History campaign?

9. The relation of struggles for resources, internal conflicts and social disorder to Darwinian stresses of unsustainable population increases. Stanton argues that humanitarian values flourished in the West over the last 250 years because the West overall was prosperous and controlled sufficient resources to have quality of life. These values decline with Darwinian struggles and fears.

10. What could be done with greater awareness that the population issue is not solved., and that 3 billion more people by 2050 is half as much again as we have already, with most of the world poor and many hungry.